I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Филолог заявил о массовой отмене обращения на «вы» с большой буквы09:36
，详情可参考爱思助手下载最新版本
Connectivity: Bluetooth 5.4 (SBC, AAC)
（一）按照纳税人最近时期销售同类货物、服务、无形资产或者不动产的平均价格确定；。业内人士推荐同城约会作为进阶阅读
The sun is a giant nuclear fusion reactor, converting hydrogen into helium and releasing massive amounts of energy in the form of heat – and sound. Sound is essentially vibration and needs a medium to travel through.，推荐阅读同城约会获取更多信息
"Without the co-CEO structure, the trade off would have either been too great for the business, or too great for the way that we wanted to have our children and have maternity leave," she reflects.